Mission
Is this central to why we exist and to the outcomes the community needs from us?
- It is central to our purpose or strategy.
- The community would feel the loss if it disappeared.
- It produces a distinctive outcome or trusted contribution.
Assess one program, service, or major activity through three essential lenses: Mission, Money, and Capacity. The goal is not a generic score—it is a clearer strategic choice.
This interactive version keeps the three dimensions separate because a high-mission activity may still need a different funding model or delivery arrangement. Your entries are saved only in this browser.
Is this central to why we exist and to the outcomes the community needs from us?
Does the funding model cover the true cost and contribute appropriately to shared infrastructure?
Do we have the people, systems, expertise, cash flow, and leadership attention to deliver well?
The overall average is only a reference point. The recommendation below is based on the relationship among Mission, Money, and Capacity.
The pattern is mixed. Use the evidence notes to identify what would change the decision, then agree on an accountable next move.
Interpret before decidingUse the recommendation as a conversation starter. The leadership team makes the decision.
Mission-critical and viable. Protect the activity and strengthen the conditions that keep it healthy.
Preserve the mission outcome while changing the funding model, scope, process, or delivery approach.
Explore shared, delegated, or coordinated delivery before carrying the full burden alone.
Concentrate limited resources on higher-fit, more viable work when the activity is neither central nor sustainable.
Educational notice. This public planning tool is adapted from the Mission–Money–Capacity Filter in the Funding the Mission in Uncertain Times Field Guide. It does not provide legal, financial, accounting, employment, or tax advice and should be used with professional judgment and the organization’s actual operating facts.